Professional Documentation Solutions: The Right Approach for Any Organization

Businesses of any size across sectors such as aerospace, medical device, pharmaceutical, financial services, and industrial areas face increasing demands for accurate, compliance-ready documentation. Some require structured content; others need traditional formats. Small and mid-size businesses struggle to afford engaging, unambiguous product manuals, user guides, installation instructions, or operational documentation that can make or break exceptional products and services.

But enterprise-grade documentation software isn’t always realistic—or necessary. 

We partner with organizations to assess your specific documentation challenges—regulatory mandates, compliance gaps, customer expectations, internal team capabilities—and design solutions using tools you already own or can affordably adopt. We then create compliant, professional content using accessible platforms, provide the training and ongoing support you need, and enable your team to maintain documentation independently without permanent consulting dependency.  Of course, if you would rather that we manage it, we are happy to do that.

Whether preparing for audits, meeting compliance mandates, creating technical manuals, or moving to professional documentation systems, we welcome project inquiries, RFP requests, and questions about our approach.

Contact Us About Your Documentation Project

The Real Documentation Challenge: Compliance Architecture, Not Software

In a world of hybrid work and rapid regulatory changes, most organizations use accessible, familiar tools for documentation—Microsoft Word, PDF documents, SharePoint, Google Drive. While specialized content management systems are ideal in theory, the realities of procurement constraints, budget limits, and team skillsets mean most organizations must work with what they already own.  We work with whatever content management system you own or want to use.  

Here’s the critical distinction: Industry standards specify what must be documented—not what software to use. Boeing doesn’t mandate proprietary tools. The FDA doesn’t require specific authoring platforms. 21 CFR Part 211 (pharmaceutical) doesn’t prescribe software. GLBA (financial services) doesn’t demand particular systems.

Compliance comes from documented content and demonstrated process—not from the tool that created the documentation. Without a unified format and process, without entering the correct information, without version control and standardization, it doesn’t matter if you use an old Underwood instead of a computer:  the result will be the same.

This principle holds across every regulated industry:

  • ATA iSpec 2200 is a documentation standard, not a software mandate
  • S1000D defines data structure—compliant output can originate from Word
  • AS9100D certification is awarded to companies using Word-based templates
  • FDA IFU requirements focus on content; medical device manufacturers author in Word and submit PDFs
  • 21 CFR Part 211 requires procedures—not specific authoring software
  • GLBA, SOX, BSA/AML require documented compliance—not particular platforms

What is a Content Management System? The Real Definition

Content Management System doesn’t mean enterprise CCMS platforms costing $15,000+ annually. A CMS is any organized, sustainable approach to creating, storing, updating, and delivering documentation.  

It could be:

  • Word templates with SharePoint storage and version control procedures

  • PDF-based documentation maintained with clear change control

  • Affordable platforms (Bit.ai, Document360, OpenDocMan)

  • Structured XML/DITA systems for complex multi-product environments

  • Hybrid approaches combining accessible tools with modular content strategies

The right CMS depends on complexity, compliance requirements, budget, and team capabilities—not on company size.

Three Service Approaches: Choose What Fits Your Needs

Foundation Documentation

 Professional, compliant documentation using accessible tools.  For organizations seeking:

  • Professional documentation delivered in Word and PDF formats
  • Built-in compliance architecture (aerospace, medical, pharma, industrial, financial services standards)
  • Clear, sustainable maintenance procedures
  • 12 months of included updates ensuring compliance stays current
  • Options for ongoing support or internal maintenance with our templates and guidance

            Capabilities include:

  • Custom templates with compliance elements built-in
  • Documented procedures for staff maintaining documentation independently
  • Professional creation by industry compliance experts
  • Version control and change management integration
  • Training materials for your team

Need professional documentation without expensive software? We create compliant procedures using Microsoft Word—tools you already own. 12 months of updates included. Let’s discuss how we can help you achieve compliance confidence affordably.

Contact Us About Your Documentation Project

 

Scalable Platform Documentation Solutions

Professional documentation with flexible platform options matching your infrastructure. For organizations seeking:

  • Platform flexibility based on budget and workflow (SharePoint optimization, affordable tools like Document360 or Bit.ai, open-source solutions like OpenDocMan)
  • Documentation designed to scale across departments or product families
  • Choices in ongoing support: full maintenance, hybrid (your team + our support), or independence after training
  • Professional documentation created by compliance experts
  • Comprehensive implementation, training, and handoff

Capabilities include:

  • Multi-platform expertise (Word/PDF, SharePoint, affordable SaaS, open-source)
  • Platform setup and configuration to your specifications
  • Modular content approaches enabling reuse across documents
  • Enterprise-wide templates ensuring consistency while allowing customization
  • Comprehensive training for your teamFlexible support models based on your preference

 

Comprehensive Enterprise Documentation Solution

Complete documentation systems scaling across divisions, product lines, and regulatory domains. For organizations seeking:

  • Documentation architecture spanning multiple divisions, facilities, or product portfolios
  • Consistency across departments while maintaining efficient updates
  • Advanced content management strategies (structured authoring, single-source publishing, modular content)
  • Flexible ongoing support from consulting partnership to enabling full internal independence
  • Compliance expertise across complex regulatory frameworks

Capabilities include:

  • Enterprise-wide architecture and strategy development
  • Compliance integration across multiple regulatory domains
  • Scalable template systems for cross-organizational consistency
  • Advanced content management and reuse strategies
  • Knowledge transfer and training enabling internal documentation excellence
  • Flexible engagement models: full maintenance, hybrid support, or independence enablement
  • Quarterly compliance reviews and regulatory update integration

Industry Examples: Our Successful Approaches

Aerospace: Boeing Supplier Documentation

The Challenge:
When Boeing’s 737 MAX door plug blew out of Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 in January 2024, it revealed critical documentation gaps throughout the supplier network. Boeing’s response was comprehensive: suppliers must implement “mistake-proof” work instructions, document torque specifications, maintain tool calibration records, and establish rigorous traceability.

Here’s what often goes unnoticed: Boeing didn’t mandate expensive software. Boeing mandated compliance with industry standards.

How One Supplier Succeeded:

Precision Aerospace Components (PAC), a mid-sized supplier of precision parts for Boeing, faced Boeing’s requirements with a practical constraint—they needed compliant documentation without enterprise software budgets.

What They Implemented:

  • Work Instructions using Microsoft Word templates with required sections (Objective, Tools/Materials, Safety, Procedures, Verification), embedded torque specifications, calibration confirmation, and mistake-proofing checkpoints
  • Quality Record Forms tracking parts, materials, processes, inspections, torque applications, and tool calibration
  • Documented Maintenance Procedures enabling staff to update instructions while maintaining compliance

Why This Met Boeing’s Requirements:
✅ Clear, mistake-proof work instructions documented
✅ Torque specifications explicitly defined
✅ Tool calibration records maintained with national standards traceability
✅ Complete traceability demonstrated for all parts and processes
✅ Version control and change management procedures documented
✅ Audit-ready compliance achieved

Critical Finding: Boeing auditors verified CONTENT compliance and PROCESS adherence. They did not evaluate which software tool created the documents.

Results:

  • Zero quality escapes (18 months; previously 3-4 annually)
  • 40% reduction in rework and scrap rates
  • Zero major findings in FAA and Boeing audits
  • 25% reduction in new employee training time
  • Business expansion with Boeing

Learn from the Boeing case study: Professional, compliant documentation doesn’t require expensive software. We create systems meeting the most stringent requirements using accessible tools. Ready to discuss your compliance challenges?

Contact Us About Your Documentation Project

 

Device Manufacturing: FDA-Compliant Instructions for Use

The Challenge:

Medical device manufacturers receive FDA rejection notices for Instructions for Use (IFU) due to: unclear language, incomplete information, inadequate testing data documentation, non-compliance with plain language requirements, poor formatting, or mismatch between labeling and intended product use.

The solution isn’t expensive software—it’s compliance architecture.

How Manufacturers Succeed:

  • FDA-Compliant Structure with required sections (device description, setup, operation, maintenance, warnings, contraindications)
  • Plain Language Design ensuring patient comprehension and FDA acceptance
  • Complete Traceability documenting all testing data, risk management, and design rationale
  • Version Control supporting FDA submissions and post-market updates
  • Professional Review by compliance experts catching gaps before FDA review

Why This Works:
✅ Content compliance verified
✅ Formatting and language standards met
✅ Testing data and risk information complete
✅ Design rationale documented
✅ Intended use clarity established

Key Insight: Manufacturers routinely author IFUs in Word and submit PDFs to the FDA. The platform doesn’t matter; compliance architecture does.

Results:

  • FDA approval on first submission
  • Faster time-to-market
  • Reduced post-market update burden
  • Confidence in compliance
  • Financial Services: Regulatory Documentation and Client Records 

The Challenge:
Financial institutions navigate complex, overlapping regulations: SEC Rule 204-2 (books and records), GLBA (data privacy), SOX (financial reporting controls), BSA/AML (customer due diligence), FINRA rules (broker conduct), PCI DSS (payment security). Missing documentation can result in regulatory fines, reputational damage, and operational disruption.

How Financial Firms Succeed:

  • Client Documentation capturing identifying information, financial profiles, investment objectives, and suitability analysis
  • Advisory Records documenting investment recommendations, trade confirmations, performance reporting, and fee justification
  • Compliance Procedures addressing CIP (Customer Identification Programs), suspicious activity monitoring, and transaction record retention
  • Control Documentation demonstrating SOX compliance and internal control effectiveness
  • Data Security Records supporting GLBA safeguarding and GDPR compliance

Why This Works:
✅ SEC registration and examination requirements satisfied
✅ Client suitability documentation complete
✅ AML/KYC procedures demonstrated
✅ Financial reporting controls documented
✅ Data protection measures verified

Key Insight: Regulatory bodies audit content and processes. Software choice is irrelevant to compliance.

Results:

  • Successful regulatory examinations
  • Reduced compliance risk
  • Faster audit response
  • Confidence in regulatory standing

Industrial Manufacturing: Operation and Maintenance Manuals

The Challenge:
Industrial equipment manufacturers create O&M manuals for complex machinery serving multiple industries. Documentation must balance technical accuracy with field usability, include safety protocols, maintenance schedules, and troubleshooting guides.

How Manufacturers Succeed:

  • Technical Specification Documentation defining equipment parameters, capabilities, and performance standards
  • Operational Procedures with safety warnings, step-by-step guidance, and error prevention
  • Maintenance Schedules with parts lists, calibration requirements, and preventive procedures
  • Troubleshooting Guides enabling field technicians to diagnose and resolve issues
  • Training Materials supporting operator certification and competency

 

Why This Works:
✅ Technical accuracy verified by engineers
✅ Safety documentation comprehensive
✅ Field usability validated with technicians
✅ Maintenance procedures clear and complete
✅ Training effectiveness measured

Key Insight: Customers need usable, accurate manuals—not proprietary file formats. Word and PDF work perfectly.

Results:

  • Reduced field support costs
  • Faster operator training
  • Fewer equipment-related incidents
  • Improved customer satisfaction

Ready to create documentation tailored to your situation? Contact us to discuss your project, request a proposal, or ask questions about how we approach technical manuals as well as regulatory and compliance documentation.

Contact Us About Your Documentation Project
Zero trust, cybersecurity, zero trust security, data breaches, John Kindervag, Forrester, NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology, security framework, ISO 27001, gap analysis, ransomware, network, phishing, what is zero trust, risk management, encryption, orchestration, file permissions, law firm procedures, restaurant procedures, remote work procedures, zero trust design, zero trust environment, zero trust architecture, multifactor authentication, microsegmentation, ZNTA, digital transformation, Identity Access Management, IAM, Data Loss Prevention, DLP, Secure Access Service Edge, SASE

WISP Written Information Security Plan

Why You Need a WISP

“…The Task Force notes that the cyber threat to U.S. critical infrastructure is outpacing efforts to reduce pervasive vulnerabilities, so that for the next decade at least the United States must lean significantly on deterrence to address the cyber threat posed by the most capable U.S. adversaries.

It is clear that a more proactive and systematic approach to U.S. cyber deterrence is urgently needed…”     -Task Force on Cyber Deterrence [DSB 2017], the Defense Science Board (DSB)

What Is a WISP?

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)-based Written Information Security Program (WISP) is a set of cyber security policies and standards that are suited for smaller organizations or those governed by NIST 800-53.  This framework has recently been updated to CSF 2.0.

While WISPs are often thought to be the preserve of larger businesses, we include businesses with fewer than 500 employees that also require the protection afforded by a WISP.

Download a sample, editable WISP here.

 

 

Do you have a WISP?

 

Our WISPs are $750 prepaid.  These are company-specific and state-compliant. They include a risk assessment of your existing policies, procedures and assets.  We also help you perform a survey of your existing assets, one that includes identification of vulnerabilities.  These are not included in other WISPs of the same type.
 

CONTACT US TO ORDER

 

Why Our Written Information Security Plans?

Our custom NIST-based WISP Written Information Security Plans identify the policies and procedures for protecting your company’s confidential data, assessing how it’s being protected, and identifying who is ensuring it’s protected.

This WISP document enables you to proactively plans for the “what ifs” and is fundamental to your organization’s security.  It can be the basis for risk management measures.  It also enables you to be compliant with State requirements, where necessary.

Whether they are included as part of the WISP or simply referred to as part of an abbreviated description, we provide complete policies and procedures referenced in the WISP.  We also offer our compliance documentation in two formats:  The first is focused on the what (NIST policies) and the other is focused on how (company-specific policies based on NIST standards).  See samples of the two approaches below.

 

Are You Required To Have a WISP?

Several industries and organizations are governed by cybersecurity regulations that require a WISP. If your organization is bound by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), then it is required to have a WISP. Recently, the 16 CFR Part 313: Privacy of Consumer Financial Information Rule under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was amended. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) developed Service Organization Controls to manage data securely with AICPA TSC 2017 SOC 2 which also requires a WISP as does the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework, recently updated to CSF 2.0. 

 

Are you an accountant? Do you have a WISP?

The FTC’s Safeguards Rule of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) says you need one.  
 

CONTACT US TO ORDER

 


FTC Safeguards Act Requirements

The Safeguards Rule applies to financial institutions subject to the FTC’s jurisdiction and that aren’t subject to the enforcement authority of another regulator under section 505 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6805. According to Section 314.1(b), an entity is a “financial institution” if it’s engaged in an activity that is “financial in nature” or is “incidental to such financial activities as described in section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, 12 U.S.C § 1843(k).”

How do you know if your business is a financial institution subject to the Safeguards Rule? First, consider that the Rule defines “financial institution” in a way that’s broader than how people may use that phrase in conversation. Furthermore, what matters are the types of activities your business undertakes, not how you or others categorize your company.

To help you determine if your company is covered, Section 314.2(h) of the Rule lists 13 examples of the kinds of entities that are financial institutions under the Rule, including mortgage lenders, payday lenders, finance companies, mortgage brokers, account servicers, check cashers, wire transferors, collection agencies, credit counselors and other financial advisors, tax preparation firms, non-federally insured credit unions, and investment advisors that aren’t required to register with the SEC. The 2021 amendments to the Safeguards Rule add a new example of a financial institution – finders. Those are companies that bring together buyers and sellers and then the parties themselves negotiate and consummate the transaction.

 

DOWNLOAD OUR INFORMATION SHEET, WISPS AND THE FTC SAFEGUARDS ACT.  YOU MAY BE SURPRISED AT WHO THE LAW APPLIES TO–IT MAY BE YOU.

 

 

Do You Live in One of These States?

If you live in one of these States, you are required to have a WISP that conforms to State requirements:  Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Vermont, District of Columbia.

Alabama: 2018 SB 318

Arkansas: Ark. Code § 4-110-104(b)

California: Calif. Civil Code § 1798.91.04

Colorado: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-713 to -713.5

Connecticut: Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-999b, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4e-70

Delaware: Del. Code § 12B-100

Florida: Fla. Stat. § 501.171(2)

Illinois: 815 ILCS 530/45

Indiana: Ind. Code § 24-4.9-3-3..5(c)

Kansas: K.S. § 50-6,139b

Louisiana: La. Rev. Stat. § 3074 (2018 SB 361)

Maryland: Md. Code Com Law §§ 14-3501 to -3503

Massachusetts: Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93H § 2(a)

Minnesota: Minn. Stat. § 325M.05

Nebraska: Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 87-801-807 (2018 L.B. 757)

Nevada: Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 603A.210, 603A.215(2)

New Mexico: N.M. Stat. § 57-12C-4 to -5

New York: New York Gen. Bus. Law § 899-BB

Ohio: Ohio Rev. Stat. § 1354.01 to 1354.05 (2018 S.B. 220)

Oregon: Or. Rev. Stat § 646A.622

Rhode Island: R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-49.3-2

South Carolina: S.C. Code § 38-99-10 to -100. (2018 HB 4655)

Texas: Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 521.052

Utah: Utah Code §§ 13-44-101, -201, 301

Vermont: 9 V.S.A § 2446-2447 (2018 HB 764)

District of Columbia: 2020 B 215


We create custom State- and NIST-compliant WISP Written Information Security Plans for business of all sizes.   This document protects you and it protects your customers or clients or patients.  These affordable documents include standalone versions of all policies and procedures that are referenced in your WISP.  For example, your WISP access control policy would be provided also as a separate document that you can use in other documents such as training manuals or employee handbooks or as standard operating procedures.

 

GET IN TOUCH

 

 


What Are the Most Common WISP Elements?

Every WISP is different–some are less comprehensive and some are more so depending on the situation.  In general, however, WISPs contain the following elements:

 

  • Designation of the employee or employees responsible for the security program
  • Identification and assessment of security risks
  • Policies for storage of data, as well as access and transportation of personal information
  • Disciplinary measures imposed on WISP violators
  • Limiting access by/to terminated employees
  • Managing the security practices of third-party vendors and contractors
  • Methods of restricting physical and digital access to records
  • Monitoring and reviewing the scope and effectiveness of the WISP
  • Documentation of data security incidents and responses

WISP Format Choices

Cybersecurity, information security, information security consulting, information security policy, business continuity plan, WISP, Written Information Security Program, WISP template, Written Information Security Program template, incident response plan, cybersecurity policy , cybersecurity best practices, small business cybersecurity, cybersecurity strategy, industrial cybersecurity, iso 27001 compliance, NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5, free download, cybersecurity consulting services, cybersecurity workbook, SBA, Small Business Administration, small business, hacktivists, bad actors, CISO, Chief Information Security Officer, Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, CSF, NIST, containment, recovery, Business Continuity Plan, National Institute of Standards and Technology, CDPP, Cybersecurity & Data Protection Program, CIS, Center for Internet Security. HIPAA. Health Insurance Portability and Accounting Act, 23 NYCRR 500, policies, procedures, SOP, standard operating procedures How you choose to format your WISP is a matter of choice, as long as it conforms to State guidelines wherever applicable.  

Writing and implementing a WISP requires assessing company business processes, an understanding of the laws and regulations that apply to the those processes, identifying potential information security gaps and weaknesses, finding the right balance between business practices and security, and educating end users about the policy once it is approved by company management.

NIST
Framework 

This WISP version is mapped to NIST standards and the terminology.

IR-4(2): INCIDENT HANDLING/DYNAMIC RECONFIGURATION
Control Objective: Include organization-defined types of dynamic reconfiguration for organization-defined system components as part of the incident response capability.

Standard: Where technically feasible and justified by a valid business case, ACME must implement automated mechanisms to enable dynamic reconfiguration of information systems as part of incident response remediation actions.

Guidelines: Dynamic reconfiguration includes changes to router rules, access control lists, intrusion detection or prevention system parameters and filter rules for guards or firewalls. Organizations may perform dynamic reconfiguration of systems to stop attacks, misdirect attackers and isolate components of systems, thus limiting the extent of the damage from breaches or compromises.

Organizations include specific time frames for achieving the reconfiguration of systems in the definition of the reconfiguration capability, considering the potential need for rapid response to effectively address cyber threats.

 


Standard Policy

Framework

This WISP version uses narrative, company-specific policies. 

RISK ASSSESSMENT
The Program Coordinator shall conduct a risk assessment to identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to the security, confidentiality and integrity of customer information that could result in its unauthorized disclosure, misuse, alteration, destruction or other compromise, and assess the sufficiency of any safeguards in place to control these risks. The risk assessment shall cover all relevant areas of the Dealership’s operations. At a minimum, the risk assessment shall cover the following:

• Employee training and management;
• Information systems, including network and software design, as well as information processing, storage, transmission and disposal; and
• Detecting, preventing and responding to attacks, intrusions or other systems failures.

Once the Program Coordinator has identified the reasonably foreseeable risks, the Program Coordinator will determine whether current policies and procedures in these areas sufficiently mitigate the potential risks identified. If not, the Program Coordinator shall design new policies and procedures that meet the objectives of the Program. Final policies and procedures that meet the objectives of the Program will be part of the Program.

FTC Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information

16 CFR Part 314: Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information )

October 2023 marks the 20th anniversary of the effective date of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Safeguards Rule. Its purpose then – and its purpose now – is to protect consumers by requiring entities covered by the Rule to “develop, implement, and maintain reasonable administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of customer information.”

The amendment announced today requires financial institutions to notify the FTC as soon as possible, and no later than 30 days after discovery, of a security breach involving the information of at least 500 consumers. Such an event requires notification if unencrypted customer information has been acquired without the authorization of the individual to which the information pertains. The notice to the FTC must include certain information about the event, such as the number of consumers affected or potentially affected.

The FTC revised the Safeguards Rule in October 2021 to strengthen protections for consumers’ information maintained by non-banking financial institutions – for example, mortgage brokers and payday lenders. Also announced was a proposed supplemental amendment to the Safeguards Rule that would require financial institutions to report certain data breaches and other security events to the FTC. The agency just approved an amendment that will require notification.

The focus is on “notification events” – defined as the “acquisition of unencrypted customer information without the authorization of the individual to which the information pertains.” If a notification event “involves the information of at least 500 consumers,” the covered entity must contact the FTC “as soon as possible, and no later than 30 days after discovery of the event” using a form on the FTC’s website.

Here are some of the things the notice must include:

  • the name and contact information of the financial institution;
  • a description of the types of information involved;
  • the date or date range of the notification event, if it’s possible to determine;
  • the number of consumers affected; and
  • a general description of the notification event.

Ig1 – Implementation Group 1

From the Center for Internet Security:

Implementation Groups (IGs) are the recommended guidance to prioritize implementation of the CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls). CIS Controls v8 defines Implementation Group 1 (IG1) as essential cyber hygiene and represents an emerging minimum standard of information security for all enterprises. IG1 is the on-ramp to the CIS Controls and consists of a foundational set of 56 cyber defense Safeguards. The Safeguards included in IG1 are what every enterprise should apply to defend against the most common attacks.

In most cases, an IG1 enterprise is typically small to medium-sized with limited IT and cybersecurity expertise to dedicate towards protecting IT assets and personnel. A common concern of these enterprises is to keep the business operational, as they have a limited tolerance for downtime.

The sensitivity of the data that they are trying to protect is low and principally surrounds employee and financial information. Safeguards selected for IG1 should be implementable with limited cybersecurity expertise and aimed to thwart general, non-targeted attacks. These Safeguards will also typically be designed to work in conjunction with small or home office commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware and software.

Safeguards selected for IG1 should be implementable with limited cybersecurity expertise and aimed to thwart general, non-targeted attacks. These Safeguards will also typically be designed to work in conjunction with small or home office commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware and software.

But no matter the size or complexity of your business, we recommend that all organizations begin with IG1. We also refer to IG1 as Essential Cyber Hygiene because it provides the actions necessary for an organization to defend itself against the major attack types being used by cybercriminals. IG1 is not just another list of good things to do; it’s an essential set of steps that helps all enterprises defend against real-world threats. And it provides a strong foundation for your cyber maturity growth, or as your security needs change. This is a strong claim, but we back it up with our use of the best-available summaries of attacks (like the Verizon DBIR), and an open, shared methodology (the CIS Community Defense Model v2.057).

NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0

 

 

 

The agency has finalized the framework’s first major update since its creation in 2014
February 26, 2024

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has updated the widely used Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), its landmark guidance document for reducing cybersecurity risk. The new 2.0 edition is designed for all audiences, industry sectors and organization types, from the smallest schools and nonprofits to the largest agencies and corporations — regardless of their degree of cybersecurity sophistication.

The CSF 2.0, which supports implementation of the National Cybersecurity Strategy, has an expanded scope that goes beyond protecting critical infrastructure, such as hospitals and power plants, to all organizations in any sector. It also has a new focus on governance, which encompasses how organizations make and carry out informed decisions on cybersecurity strategy. The CSF’s governance component emphasizes that cybersecurity is a major source of enterprise risk that senior leaders should consider alongside others such as finance and reputation.

The updated framework anticipates that organizations will come to the CSF with varying needs and degrees of experience implementing cybersecurity tools. New adopters can learn from other users’ successes and select their topic of interest from a new set of implementation examples and quick-start guides designed for specific types of users, such as small businesses, enterprise risk managers, and organizations seeking to secure their supply chains.

A new CSF 2.0 Reference Tool now simplifies the way organizations can implement the CSF, allowing users to browse, search and export data and details from the CSF’s core guidance in human-consumable and machine-readable formats.

Read More Here: NIST Releases Version 2.0 of Landmark Cybersecurity Framework https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2024/02/nist-releases-version-20-landmark-cybersecurity-framework

NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 Full Text

This free download is the full text of the NIST Revision 5, September 2020. This publication provides a catalog of security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations to protect organizational operations and assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation from a diverse set of threats and risks, including hostile attacks, human errors, natural disasters, structural failures, foreign intelligence entities, and privacy risks. 

 

  NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5

NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5,NIST CSF, infosecurity, information security, information security consulting, information security policy, NIST cybersecurity, cybersecurity best practices, small business cybersecurity, cybersecurity strategy, industrial cybersecurity, iso 27001 compliance, cybersecurity consulting services, information security risk management, information security standards,

 

 

Why Work With Us?

We are creative, believers in critical thought.  Our layouts are sophisticated and appropriate, effective.  Our work is due diligent, informative and engaging.  Let our technical writing services save you time, money, revisions and failed presentations.

GET IN TOUCH